Re: SquirrelMail installation difficulties
Just a second opinion backup Stephen Gran's. Not the prettiest, but it is
straight cgi/html output and needs a bit of tweaking.
www.inter7.com/sqwebmail
On 05 October 2002 01:55 am, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Forrest L Norvell said:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 11:33:43AM -0700, nate wrote:
> > > Forrest L Norvell said:
> > > > "You must be logged in to view this page" error. Thinking that I
> > > > might be
> > >
> > > I read in the PHP docs that something to do with session management
> > > was broken on powerPC:
> > >
> > > "Sessions do NOT work on hppa, m68k, mips, powerpc, sparc, s390
> > > Sorry about that. :("
> > >
> > > from README.Debian.gz on the php package.
> >
> > Well, that just sucks. I didn't see that in the Readme; thanks for
> > pointing it out to me. Anyone got a webmail package they like that isn't
> > dependent upon PHP sessions? Does imp work on PPC?
> >
> > Forrest
>
> steve@mercury:~$ apt-cache show sqwebmail
> Package: sqwebmail
> Priority: optional
> Section: mail
> Installed-Size: 883
> Maintainer: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <racke@linuxia.de>
> Architecture: i386
> Source: courier
> Version: 0.37.3-2.1
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libgdbmg1, exim | mail-transport-agent,
> courier-base (>= 0.37.3), courier-authdaemon (>= 0.37.3), ispell, iamerican
> | ispell-dictionary, apache | httpd, cron, expect, courier-maildrop (>=
> 0.37.3) Suggests: gnupg, courier-pcp
> Filename: pool/updates/main/c/courier/sqwebmail_0.37.3-2.1_i386.deb
> Size: 285110
> MD5sum: 552cfb82cef0e7ae20485175a9c0fcb3
> Description: Webmail Server
> This package contains the SqWebMail webmail server.
> This CGI is used by the Courier mail server to provide
> webmail access to local mailboxes. SqWebMail is provided
> here as a separate package that can be used with other
> mail servers as well.
>
> Works quite well for me (x86, but I assume it works on PPC, or it
> shouldn't be in stable.) No PHP, just cgi/perl. The default template
> is kind of ugly, but it shoudn't be too hard to rewrite when I get a
> little more time.
>
> HTH,
> Steve
Reply to: