Re: OT: MS C++.net vs Borland Builder (with Linux support in future)

[Russell <rjshaw@iprimus.com.au>]

Paul McHale wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have to decide between Borland C++ builder and MS.NET for a relatively
> simple windows GUI development.  Given there are quite a few very
> experienced developers here, I thought some of you may have preferences.
> 
> I am new to C++ and builder looks much simpler to develop for.  Any
> recommendations welcome.  One strong motivation for Borland builder is the
> impending Linux version.  Is this real?  Will it actually be cross platform
> compatible?

Borland has a dedicated news-server for various builder topics that
would be worth subscribing to. See borland.com