[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: D-Link DWL650 D-Link DWL900 and Debian



This one time, at band camp, Jim McCloskey said:

<snip success story - congratulations!>

> Or at any rate it works fairly well. I get a lot of error-messages
> like this:
> 
>   Tx error, status 1 (FID=00F0)
> 
> (annoying on the console and in the log-files, but invisible in
> X). This must mean that I'm getting poorer performance than I
> might. But still, the basic setup is more than functional for
> everything I've so far tried---web-browsing, mail, ssh connects to
> other hosts, and so on (as is shown, for instance, by the fact that
> I'm sending this (or will, I hope) over the wireless connection).
> 
> I'm puzzled mainly by the sense that it shouldn't be working this
> well. If I understand correctly, the D-Link DWL650 is a prism card and
> is best supported by drivers made available in the linux-wlan-ng
> package. In getting that package to work, though, I got stalled by the
> requirement of compiling a new kernel-module, which required both the
> kernel-source and the independent (non-kernel) pcmcia-cs source. My
> pcmcia stuff works well at present; I've hand-compiled pcmcia source
> in the past. If I can avoid doing it again, I'd like to, especially if
> installing and hand-compiling it might compromise things that work
> well at present. But if I thought it would stop the flow of Tx error
> messages, and would improve performance, and if I thought that it
> wouldn't break existing working systems, I'd certainly take this step
> also.
> 
> Thanks very much indeed to all who helped already. If anybody had any
> further thoughts or advice, I'd be really grateful,

I have a card that uses the orinoco_cs driver on this laptop, and I get
the same kind of drop errors all the time.  Some googling suggested that
the linux-wlan-ng package (and related recompiles) would do me good, but
as I also have a wired connection, I so far haven't tried, so I have no
concrete advice to offer.  It does seem that linux-wlan-ng provides
better drivers than the stock kernel ones.  If you want to try it out
without hosing your current setup, I suppose you could try a multiple
kernel image solution - booting 2.4.18 with stock kernel modules, and
2.4.19 with linux-wlan-ng modules, and see how it goes (for what it's
worth, I did see some speed improvement for my card, but kirqsoftd also
sometimes spins out of control under heavy use, and uses %100 CPU.  Only
resolvable by popping the card out and back in)

Good luck, and let us (or at least me) know how it goes!

Steve

-- 
patent:
	A method of publicizing inventions so others can copy them.

Attachment: pgpSNJ14YXP87.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: