[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: howto bcc the bcc's in mutt



On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 02:29:32PM +1000, Chris Kenrick wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:09:16AM +0000, p wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:02:36PM +1000, Chris Kenrick wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 01:56:01AM +0000, p wrote:
> > > > debs,
> > > > 
> > > > prelim:  i just got a promotion--sysop of a
> > > > 	 hundred-user network.  ...peanuts
> > > > 	 to most on the list, probably....
> > > 
> > > Congratulations on the promotion, and good luck!
> > 
> > thx.  hopefully, i'll be able to populate the 
> > system with linux, debian, of course!
> > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > prob:  	 when i fire up mutt for emailing 
> > > >  	 those 100 users.  i'd like to bcc
> > > > 	 each user without the other 99 
> > > >          users' email addys being included 
> > > > 	 in the bcc.  (so, each user's bcc 
> > > > 	 header only has 1 email addy in it, 
> > > > 	 not 100.)
> > > > 
> > > > q:	 is there a way for mutt to bcc the
> > > > 	 bcc's?
> > > 
> > > I don't follow you here.  The recipient of the email can only see the To
> > > and cc headers, but nothing at all for bcc.  So doesn't it do what you
> > > want already?
> > > 
> > > - Chris
> > >
> >  
> > //
> > 
> > 
> > ...sorry, i knew that my setup wasn't as complete
> > as it should've been.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > for example:  
> > 
> > 	i have the 100 users's email addys as 
> > 	an alias in .muttrc.
> > 
> > 	i send the same email to each of the 
> > 	100 users by addressing it to myself
> > 	and "bcc-ing" it to the 100 users. 
> > 	
> > 	what i've seen is that the 100 users'
> > 	email addys are in the "resent-to" 
> > 	header (like the attached, test
> > 	email).  what i'm hoping is that 
> > 	_each user_ doesn't have to see the
> > 	other user's email addys, like what
> > 	the "list" (deb-user) does--we get
> > 	list emails without seeing who else
> > 	gets them.
> > 
> > is this "bcc biz" the wrong approach?  
> 
> No, if all is configured properly then the bcc approach should work
> fine.  Sounds like your mail delivery agent (MDA) might be at fault
> here.  Which MDA are you using?
> 
> - Chris
> 
> 
>
//

i just found out it's procmail, but i've never
touched it for anything.  (i've been fat 'n 
happy for years with the company of exim, mutt,
& fetchmail.)

so now i need to set up something in procmail?

thx.

b.
 
// 



Reply to: