Re: APM + ACPI in kernel? (was Re: Debian 3.0r0 wont 'powerdown')
Linux ACPI doesn't support suspend-to-RAM (or disk) yet, does it?
The acpi4linux URL I have is out of date.
-chris
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > Perhaps your system uses ACPI rather than APM for power management. They
> > can't both be compiled into the kernel at the same time, so you'll have
> > to recompile.
>
> I have both compiled into my 2.4.18 kernel. If I want ACPI, I put
> 'apm=off' in my lilo.conf; if I want APM, I don't and, since APM is
> activated first, ACPI just doesn't initiate. Is it not good to set
> things up that way? It seems to work - ACPI is up at the moment, as this
> excerpt from dmesg says:
>
> apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x02 (Driver version 1.16)
> apm: disabled on user request.
> ...
> ACPI: Core Subsystem version [20011018]
> ACPI: Subsystem enabled
> Power Resource: found
> ACPI: System firmware supports S0 S1 S3 S4 S5
> Processor[0]: C0 C1 C2 C3, 8 throttling states
> ACPI: Battery socket found, battery present
> ACPI: AC Adapter found
> ACPI: Power Button (FF) found
> ACPI: Lid Switch (CM) found
> ACPI: Thermal Zone found
>
> Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Wiseman
> pwiseman@mindspring.com
> Linux user #17943
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: