Re: 1:3.0.2p1-9 > 1:3.4p1-0.0potato1 ?
Alexander Steinert <stony8@gmx.de> writes:
> > > Is 1:3.0.2p1-9 considered greater than 1:3.4p1-0.0potato1 because it
> > > comes from testing, is it a matter of order in sources.list or are there
> > > rules I don't know yet?
> >
> >
> > last night that confused me too. eventually i tracked it down to the
> > Packages file not being updated. I would suspect they did not update
> > the Packages file(at least as of when i looked) so they have the files
> > there, and test them in the meantime before making them accessable to
> > apt-get
>
> Sounds sensible. Reading your reply I remember myself seeing the
> 1:3.0.2p1-9 entry in Packages, too. Maybe I was too tired to recognize
> this as the root of my problem.
I haven't really been following this discussion so I don't know if this
information is at all pertinent, but I added the woody security source
to my sources.list in order to get mozilla1.0.0 and ssh was upgraded to
1:3.4p1-0.0woody1 earlier today. I added:
deb http://security.debian.org woody/updates main contrib non-free
HTH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: