Re: 1:3.0.2p1-9 > 1:3.4p1-0.0potato1 ?
> > Is 1:3.0.2p1-9 considered greater than 1:3.4p1-0.0potato1 because it
> > comes from testing, is it a matter of order in sources.list or are there
> > rules I don't know yet?
>
>
> last night that confused me too. eventually i tracked it down to the
> Packages file not being updated. I would suspect they did not update
> the Packages file(at least as of when i looked) so they have the files
> there, and test them in the meantime before making them accessable to
> apt-get
Sounds sensible. Reading your reply I remember myself seeing the
1:3.0.2p1-9 entry in Packages, too. Maybe I was too tired to recognize
this as the root of my problem.
Thanx
Stony
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: