Re: 2.2 vs 2.4 kernels

[Reid Gilman <blueplazma@attbi.com>]

The Debian stable release is that, stable.  It is not supposed to have the latest and greatest features, if you want to get the 2.4.x kernels (which in my experience are perfectly stable) you can, or you can get the testing or unstable distro.  But that's why Debian has three distros.

On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 17:03, Nick Jacobs wrote:
> Can someone explain (or supply a pointer to an
> explanation of) what is wrong with the 2.4
> kernel, that debian plans to continue offering the
> 2.2 kernel with woody?
> Several other distros have been shipping with
> 2.4 exclusively for over a year, surely most
> of the bugs have been shaken out?
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
>
>
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part