Re: Debian: abandon ship?
>>"Noah" == Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> writes:
Noah> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:47:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Indeed, the security team indicated that potato support would
>> have to be dropped summarily when woody was released _unless_ changes
>> were made (or a decision would have to be made to only support some
>> arches, but not all, even from the mainstream ones). This was
>> obviously unacceptable.
Noah> Obviously unacceptable? It's how stuff has been done in the past. How
Noah> long was it after potato's release that we dropped support for slink?
Noah> IIRC it was little more than a month.
I beg your pardon. I should have said I find it obviously
unacceptable, and a number of people, users, develoers, etc, would
have liked more than 30 days to upgrade or lose security fixes. The
RM apparently agrees with me.
manoj
--
I am the wandering glitch -- catch me if you can.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: