Re: this post is not off-topic
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:43:13AM -0700, David Wright wrote:
>> I'll ignore the ad hominem. How about a poll at debianplanet?
>
> Because those have always had the power to command what developers do,
> right?
>
>> ( ) No architecture should move forward untill all can move
>> forward together.
>>
>> ( ) i386 and PPC should take priority; other architectures
>> can follow when they're ready.
>>
>> I guess you're confident that the second option would only get 2 votes.
>
> Ah, yes. So the security team will have to support both potato and
> woody, because both will be stable on different architectures.
That's not necessarily a bad thing, however. There's probably a
decent number of server admins that would be happy if the security
team supported potato after woody was released. It's come up on this
list before...
--
Brian Nelson <nelson@bignachos.com>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: