on Mon, Apr 22, 2002, Shawn McMahon (smcmahon@eiv.com) wrote:
> begin Karsten M. Self quotation:
> >
> > First, ricochet is pretty naive. It would be very helpful to specify
> > _only_ non-spoofed headers be responded to. This is difficult to do,
>
> spamcop does a pretty good job of it. It's not perfect, but it's pretty
> good.
My problem was automating it. With 50-100 messages daily, I am simply
_not_ going to spend much time processing spam. SA does a good enough
job on the initial cut that it meets my needs. Let's say that spamcop
and I misfired a time or two too many.
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
A guide to GNU/Linux backups:
http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/backups.html
Attachment:
pgp_h_gS74rQL.pgp
Description: PGP signature