Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 07:29:28PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include <hallo.h>
> Grant Edwards wrote on Wed Apr 17, 2002 um 12:32:09PM:
>
> > I notice that "woody" installs a 2.2 kernel instead of a 2.4
>
> Then you should read Release Notes
I did. I didn't find the answer to my question. Can you tell
me which section explains the reasons why Debian still uses a
2.2.20 kernel by default instead of a 2.4 kernel like most
other distros?
> and put the bf2.4 CD into the drive.
1) I don't have any Debian CDs.
2) I've already got a 2.4 kernel installed.
3) I'm going to build a custom 2.4 kernel-image package anyway
and the product with that.
My concern is that if Debian hasn't switched to a 2.4 kernel,
there must be a reason. If I start shipping a product with
Debian running a 2.4 kernel, I don't want to find out that
reason from annoyed customers.
--
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: