Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4

To: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
From: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 19:29:28 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020417172928.GA5418@zombie.inka.de>
Mail-followup-to: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020417123208.A15098@visi.com>
References: <[🔎] 20020417123208.A15098@visi.com>

#include <hallo.h>
Grant Edwards wrote on Wed Apr 17, 2002 um 12:32:09PM:
> 
> I notice that "woody" installs a 2.2 kernel instead of a 2.4

Then you should read Release Notes and put the bf2.4 CD into the drive.

Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- 
Wer Stabilität aufgibt, um Benutzerfreundlichkeit zu bekommen, verdient
keins der beiden und bekommt meist auch keins.
                                        -- frei nach B. Franklin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
  - From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>

References:
- Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
  - From: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
Next by Date: IPCop on Debian
Previous by thread: Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
Next by thread: Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread