Re: The latest round of antivirus bouncebacks
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 08:39 pm, Gary Turner wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 22:17:21 -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> >begin ben quotation:
> >> reiterate them. as for the modification, i have no idea what ms-tnef is,
> >> much less why it should or shouldn't be permitted. since you apparently
> >> do, what should its status be relative to desired propriety on the list?
> >
> >It's a Microsoft proprietary standard for encapsulation of MAPI
> >messages. It's been discussed in this list as recently as yesterday and
> >today.
>
> It has been referenced, but neither discussed nor described. This is
> the first definition of what it is that I've seen. All I've known is
> that looking at it raw, it is not text that I can read, so out it goes.
1. no spam
2. no html, ms-tnef (?)
3. wrap text
with reference to ms-tnef, is this a reasonable and workable prohibition?
personally, i 've never been offended by it. is it actually an impediment on
the list?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: