[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Recent Woody ISO



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 07 April 2002 12:20 pm, Brian W. Carver wrote:
> Woody ISOs can be found at: http://www.linuxiso.org/debian.html
>
> Not sure if there are more recent ones than that.
>
> Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >     Greetings:
> >
> > Yesterday, I pulled down disk 1 of the unofficial Woody.  I tried to use
> > it for an install on a friends RedHat boxen.  It started well (boot) and
> > we proceeded through the install.  Finally, boot options were presented,
> > and we choose the floppy method.  This failed each time with known good
> > floppies.  I finally pulled a 2.2.r3 out and used it, and finally got the
> > nic working, and performed a dist-upgrade.
> >
> > What I would like to learn is where I can get a very recent copy of Woody
> > for the next box (a P100)?  I could find no mirrors in the US, only over
> > seas which, even with my bw, was very slow.
> >
> > Thanks for any tips.  Tatah

    Greetings Brian:

That link is down for the actual image, also it states the build is 1/3/2002, 
which isn't too recent.  I did search the debian archives, and had checked 
this link out from a prior post during my original quest.  Yet I am still 
most interested in seeing what will be the final Woody install method.

Thank you, be well
- -- 

Jaye Inabnit\ARS ke6sls\/A GNU-Debian linux user\/ http://www.qsl.net/ke6sls
If it's stupid, but works, it ain't stupid. I SHOUT JUST FOR FUN.
Free software, in a free world, for a free spirit. Please Support freedom!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8sKtnZHBxKsta6kMRAm9kAKCN9AUm/A6iEchV89kMPo5zA8benACePF/J
k+weUb9lCa7ppn/tKYKqMsk=
=uVYM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: