Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?

To: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>
Cc: Jonathan Matthews <jaycee@jaycee.uklinux.net>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?
From: "Adam Majer" <adamm@galacticasoftware.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 02:24:19 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020316082419.GC1001@galacticasoftware.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] XFMail.20020315131728.shalehperry@attbi.com>
References: <[🔎] 20020315183622.GA447@bigdaddy.jaycee.home> <[🔎] XFMail.20020315131728.shalehperry@attbi.com>

On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:17:28PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> 
> On 15-Mar-2002 Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> > Does anyone have idea why, after dist-upgrading my 486/25 router from
> > stable -> testing, ssh'ing in takes massively longer than before?
> > 
> 
> ssh2 is more computationally intensive.

That is why I just have telnetd running on the internal interface.

- Adam

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?
  - From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>

References:
- SSH 2 slower than 1?
  - From: Jonathan Matthews <jaycee@jaycee.uklinux.net>
- Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 3c5x9setup: EEPROM rewritting
Next by Date: Re: Woody ISO's ?
Previous by thread: Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?
Next by thread: Re: SSH 2 slower than 1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread