Re: segfault with postponed and mutt_1.3.27-4_i386
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 01:25:09PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:12:13AM +0100, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 06:04:02PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > > Maybe the subject change will make more eyes look at the message...
> > >
> > > If you *haven't* seen this problem yourself, I'd like to know, as well
> > > if you have.
Well, finally, I can give you an answer to that one ;). See below.
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:20:54PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > > > If I have more than one message postponed, mutt segfaults, this
> > > > is with mbox or maildir postponed folders.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone else seen this?
> >
> > I haven't seen it, because I haven't tried it. What are the steps that
> > lead to the segfault? Does it happen the moment you say yes the second
> > time mutt asks you if you want to postpone the message?
> >
>
> Yes. I have filed a bug against mutt with more specific information.
>
> I just did it again...
>
> One message in postponed? works normally.
>
> More than one? output below:
>
> Reading /home/mfedyk/Mail/postponed... 1Segmentation fault
>
> It also works if I don't relocate my postponed folder, or if it is in mbox
> or maildir format.
I see. Well, I tried it, and I don't have any problems. 2, 3 postponed
messages, no problem at all. I read the bug report, and I noticed that
it says your version of mutt is 1.3.27-2, not 1.3.27-4, like it says in
the title. Which version is it, really? Have you tried upgrading?
--
Note that I use Debian version 3.0
Linux mus 2.4.17mvz2 #1 Wed Feb 27 17:41:43 CET 2002 i686 unknown
Matijs
Reply to: