[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ALSA modules not loading



Let me guess.  You used alsaconf to configure alsa, right?  I ran into
the same problem.  If you edit your alsa config file (in
/etc/alsa/modutils) you will see the line that contains the snd_dac_etc
stuff, just delete the whole line and things should work.

Caleb

On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 16:23, Richard Weil wrote:
> Yet another ALSA question ...
> 
> Problems are with a maestro-2 (es1968) soundcard
> running on 2.4.18-ac3, ALSA compiled from source on an
> up-to-date Woody system.[Same problems occurred with
> other kernels, but I never fixed them.]
> 
> In a nutshell, the ALSA modules won't load
> automatically.  If I use "insmod" I can insert the
> relevant sound modules one-by-one and ALSA works. If I
> use "modprobe" I can get all of the sound modules to
> load _except_ for "snd-card-es1968". I get the
> following error:
> 
> lib/modules/2.4.18-ac3/alsa/snd-card-es1968.o: invalid
> parameter parm_snd_dac_frame_size
> 
> /lib/modules/2.4.18-ac3/alsa/snd-card-es1968.o: insmod
> 
> /lib/modules/2.4.18-ac3/alsa/snd-card-es1968.o failed
> 
> /lib/modules/2.4.18-ac3/alsa/snd-card-es1968.o: insmod
> snd-card-es1968 failed
> 
> I think this error is probably whats stopping the
> modules from loading automatically when I start a
> player, like alsaplayer. I've checked in
> /etc/modules.conf and everything looks fine. The
> parameter mentioned as being invalid is fine per the
> ALSA docs. I also tried it with a few different values
> and still no dice.
> 
> Any ideas? Why would insmod work but not modprobe?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Richard
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: