What is wrong with gcc-doc?
For a few months now I haven't been able to install the GCC
documentation. This is most annoying. However, there is no bug filed
so I'm wondering if maybe I've just got something broken?
Here's what happens:
# apt-get -s install gcc-doc
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
alsa-source build-essential g++ g++-2.95 gcc gcc-2.95 gobjc gobjc-2.95
libstdc++2.10-dev libtool task-devel-common task-objc-dev
The following NEW packages will be installed:
gcc-doc
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 12 to remove and 244 not upgraded.
Remv alsa-source (0.9+0beta10-5 Debian:testing)
Remv build-essential (5 Debian:testing)
Remv g++ (2:2.95.4-9 Debian:testing) [g++-2.95 ]
Remv g++-2.95 (1:2.95.4-1 Debian:testing) [libstdc++2.10-dev ]
Remv libstdc++2.10-dev (1:2.95.4-1 Debian:testing)
Remv task-objc-dev (0.7 )
Remv gobjc-2.95 (1:2.95.4-1 Debian:testing) [gobjc ]
Remv gobjc (2:2.95.4-9 Debian:testing)
Remv task-devel-common (0.7 )
Remv libtool (1.4.2-3 Debian:testing)
Remv gcc (2:2.95.4-9 Debian:testing) [gcc-2.95 ]
Remv gcc-2.95 (1:2.95.4-1 Debian:testing)
Inst gcc-doc (1:2.95.2-20 Debian:testing)
Conf gcc-doc (1:2.95.2-20 Debian:testing)
Why is it removing GCC (and all the rest of that stuff) in order to
install gcc-doc???
I can't see anything in the gcc-doc info that leads me to believe it
should remove the rest of the stuff:
# apt-cache show gcc-doc
...
Source: gcc (2.95.2-20)
Version: 1:2.95.2-20
Replaces: gcc (<=2.7.2.3-4.3), egcs-docs (<< 2.95), gcc-docs (<< 2.95.2)
Provides: egcs-docs
Conflicts: gcc-docs (<< 2.95.2), egcs-docs (<< 2.95)
...
OK, so replaces gcc <= 2.7.2.3-4.3, but I don't have that, and there's
no conflict with the other stuff, so what's going on?
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <pausmith@nortelnetworks.com> HASMAT--HA Software Mthds & Tools
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.
Reply to: