also sprach Adam Majer <adamm@galacticasoftware.com> [2002.01.16.0329 +0100]: > > "kernel-image-2.2.20" (you don't want to run < 20, and 2.4 isn't > > ready for production in many peoples' opinion (i use it for > > production though)). > > IMHO, the added flexibility of iptables beats makes 2.4 safer than 2.2 > - just just need to set up uptables Right. note also that i said "many peoples' opinion". i actually agree with you. 2.4 is stable enough if you compile it yourself with the bare essentials, disabled kmod (you should for productive systems anyway), and if you protect it with a proper iptables setup. and speaking of CheckPoint Firewall-1, you guys know about www.fwbuilder.org, right? have a look, those of you who know CP's GUI :_) -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck if you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you.
Attachment:
pgp_om_lK5SEt.pgp
Description: PGP signature