[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

cdrecord problem



I just did apt-get install cdrecord.  I have an all-SCSI system, so my
SCSI driver is compiled into the kernel.  Following is the problem I'm
experiencing:

root@frank:/etc# cdrecord -scanbus
Cdrecord 1.10 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2001 Jörg Schilling
cdrecord: No such file or directory. Cannot open SCSI driver.
cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. Make sure you
are root.

My /etc/cdrecord.conf is:

CDR_DEVICE=plextor
#
# The following definitions allow abstract device names.
# They are used if the device name does not contain the
# the characters ',', ':', '/' and '@'
#
# drive name    device  speed   fifosize driveropts
#
plextor=        0,4,0   12      -1      ""

/dev/cdrom is a symbolic link to /dev/sr0, which is assigned to the
Plextor at start-up:

root@frank:/etc# dmesg | grep CD
Vendor: PLEXTOR   Model: CD-R   PX-W124TS  Rev: 1.05
Type:   CD-ROM                             ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 4, lun 0
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.12

/dev/sr0 is a symbolic link to /dev/scd0.  /dev/scd0 appears as follows:

root@frank:/etc# ls -al /dev/scd0
crw-r--r--    1 root     root      21,   0 Dec 13 19:54 /dev/scd0

Any thoughts or ideas would be appreciated.  Thanks!
--
 ____) ,_)        ,_)
(-(__  |_  _  _ |/
 ____) | |(_)(_ |\
(                 \_,
 _______________________________________________
| http://www.exitwound.org : hard to find       |
 _______________________________________________
| "Arguments with furniture are rarely          |
| productive." -- Kehlog Albran, "The Profit"   |
 _______________________________________________
 -------------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-------------
| Version: 3.1                                  |
| GJ/IT d- s: a C+++>$ UL++++ P+++ L+++ E--- W++| 
| N+@ o K- w O- M- V PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+@ 5@ X++ |
| R tv+@ b+ DI++++ D+ G++ e++++ h---- r+++ y+++ |
 --------------END GEEK CODE BLOCK--------------



Reply to: