[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Printing to HP Laserjet 1100



On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:37:01PM -0200, Michel Loos wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 10:31, Pedro Zorzenon Neto wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> >    I have a HP Laserjet 1100 printer. It works ok with magicfilter.
> >    In the Debian machine with magicprinter, it prints about 2 pages
> > per minute.
> >    Using the driver that came with it, in a machine with other Pseudo-OS
> > that I wont say the name here :-) it prints 8 pages per minute.
> > 
> >    I am using the same 600x600 resolution in both tests.
> >    
> 
> What are you printing (and how did you configure your printer)? 
> actual transformation from file format to printer language is done by a
> large variety of programs depending on the format of your file and the
> way you want to use your printer

Hi Michael,

 I am printing postscript files. Used 'magicfilterconfig' to configure it.
 Just changed the resolution from 300 to 600 in /etc/magicfilter/...

 I had another off-list answer to this question. Ben told me to check
 http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=62816

 and I discovered that this printer is very slow with ghostscript
versions prior to 5.50

 "potato" gs is 5.10, so I changed this printer to another machine that
is "woody" (gs 5.50) and it worked very fast.

 I think gs 5.10 uses PCL4 to send data and gs 5.50 uses PCL5, that
supports some compactation while sending the data.

> >    It seems that the faster driver implements some data compression and
> > data is sent quickly to the parallel port. (not sure about this)
> 
> Or that it does not need to be transformed (much more probable)

the time spent was not during the conversion. It was the transmition to
the printer.

  Thanks to everyone,
  Pedro

> 
> Michel.
>  
> >    Is there any configuration in the parallel port that could make it
> > faster? (the bios parallel port configuration are the same in both tests)
> > 
> >    Does anyone know something about this??? Any hints?
> > 
> >      Thanks,
> >      Pedro



Reply to: