Thus spake Adam Warner (lists@consulting.net.nz): > Since you want the latest software you might want to consider > `unstable'. Being an experienced user you'll be able to deal with > problems (e.g. if you need to downgrade a package). And it's more > secure than testing.* > > If you do upgrade remember to do it in two steps. First add testing to > your sources.list and then do an apt-get update && apt-get > dist-upgrade -u > > Repeat for unstable if you want to upgrade to the latest software. Say you've got a testing install. Is it better to just pull in sources from unstable as well, or to actually dist-upgrade to unstable? As I understand it, unstable is a moving target. What would be the difference? I dist-upgraded to testing, but most of my packages are from unstable. -- Justin R. Miller <incanus@codesorcery.net> View my website at http://codesorcery.net Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31
Attachment:
pgpqwuNgXqMNs.pgp
Description: PGP signature