Re: mail2.secnoc.de spewing yesterdays mail back to list
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 15:51:09 -0600, Jaakko Niemi <listmaster@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > Mail is being spewed back onto d-user from "root@mail2.secnoc.de".
> > Several hundred so far ...
>
> I don't see any evidence of that and there are no subscriptions
> from that domain. You are the only one reporting this.
>
> When reporting issues like this, please always forward example
> mail of the problem with _full headers_ included.
He may be the only one who reported it, but certainly isn't the only
person to put "root@mail2.secnoc.de" in their kill file....
(many more where this came from -- all duplicates of previous posts...)
-------- <message> ---------------------------------------------------------
Status: U
Return-Path: <bounce-debian-user=egm2=jps.net@lists.debian.org>
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([216.234.231.6])
by kestrel (Earthlink/Onemain SMTP Server) with SMTP id u11u0e.tv.37tiu4r
for <egm2@jps.net>; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:10:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 471 invoked by uid 38); 7 Dec 2001 16:55:56 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender: root@mail2.secnoc.de
Received: (qmail 32255 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 16:55:36 -0000
Received: from mail2.secnoc.de (212.168.67.8)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 16:55:36 -0000
Received: by mail2.secnoc.de (Postfix, from userid 0)
id B8AA426C5FE; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:54:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:54:06 -0800
From: "Montagne, Michael" <montagne@BOORA.com>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Progeny Switch
Message-ID: <[🔎] BE2BCDBC88B5D311A3440008C7DFB64616B1D6@WEBMAIL>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Resent-Message-ID: <IbgjjB.A.hG.bSPE8@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/184844
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
I've come to the point where I need to cut the cord with Progeny. I've read
the how-tos about converting to Woody and they each seem frought with peril.
What is wrong with this scenario? I change my sources.list to include the
debian sites, run dist-upgrade and call it good. I'll leave the progeny
lines in, and as they get outdated, they will be replaced as I run
dist-upgrades. That way I can leverage the proper setup that Progeny has
brought me and I won't have to run modconf or any other complication.
This seems all too simple.
-mjm
------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
------------- </message> ------------------------------------------------------
--
Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>
Reply to: