[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: secvpn routing issue



Brooks R. Robinson, 2001-Nov-30 08:46 -0600:
> Greetings,
> 	Okay gang, I need help again.  I'm doing the vpn thing with secvpn.  I've
> got routing issues.  Let me first run down the systems:
> 
> System #1 (foo)
> ----------------------
> Linux foo 2.4.12 #1 Wed Nov 21 08:34:48 CST 2001 i686 unknown
> running on fairly recent woody
> 
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:BA:F3:EC:3A
>           inet addr:192.168.100.100  Bcast:192.168.100.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:392228 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:172 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>           RX bytes:24167762 (23.0 Mb)  TX bytes:38967 (38.0 Kb)
>           Interrupt:9 Base address:0xef20
> 
> ppp0      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
>           inet addr:10.1.1.1  P-t-P:10.1.1.2  Mask:255.255.255.255
>           UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:3857 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:3850 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
>           RX bytes:323536 (315.9 Kb)  TX bytes:323124 (315.5 Kb)
> 
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> 10.1.1.2        0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 ppp0
> 192.168.100.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
> 172.16.0.0      10.1.1.2        255.255.0.0     UG    0      0        0 ppp0
> 
> Chain input (policy ACCEPT):
> Chain forward (policy ACCEPT):
> Chain output (policy ACCEPT):
> 
> This machine is the initiator for the secvpn vpn.  I've removed the
> references to internet for obvious reasons.
> 
> 
> 
> System #2 (bar)
> ------------------------
> Linux bar 2.2.19 #1 Thu Nov 1 19:52:06 EST 2001 i586 unknown
> running on fairly recent potato
> 
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:08:C7:05:61:36
>           inet addr:172.16.1.43  Bcast:172.16.255.255  Mask:255.255.0.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>           Interrupt:11 Base address:0x8000
> 
> ppp0      Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
>           inet addr:10.1.1.2  P-t-P:10.1.1.1  Mask:255.255.255.255
>           UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:6638 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:6645 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
> 
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> 10.1.1.1        0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 ppp0
> 192.168.100.0   10.1.1.1        255.255.255.0   UG    0      0        0 ppp0
> 172.16.0.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0 eth1
> 
> Chain input (policy ACCEPT):
> Chain forward (policy ACCEPT):
> Chain output (policy ACCEPT):
> 
> This machine is the recipient for the secvpn vpn.  I've removed the
> references to internet for obvious reasons.
> 
> So here's the scoop.  I can ping 172.16.1.43 from foo, and I can ping
> 192.168.100.100 from bar.  I can ssh to and from both, and they connect
> without a hitch.  The problem is that I can't ping 192.168.100.1 from bar,
> and I cannot 172.16.1.1 from foo.  If I try to traceroute 192.168.100.1 from
> bar it gets as far as 10.1.1.1 and dies out.  Help, help, help.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brooks

What interface has 192.168.100.1 and 172.16.1.1?  You don't
indicate where they are or what the path should be to get there.

I assume the default routes for each were omitted, and point to
you internet provider.

On your successful pings, use a traceroute for those to confirm
the path they are taking to help troubleshoot.

jc


-- 
Jeff Coppock		Systems Engineer
Diggin' Debian		Admin and User



Reply to: