FYI: RFC-822 is obsolete

["Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" <rms46@vlsm.org>]

> I'd suggest a massive response (that is, many people, not one person
> replying many times) to the postmaster address, or other WHOIS contacts
> listed if postmaster is invalid (an RFC 822 violation, FWIW).

FYI,

- RFC-822 has been replaced with RFC-2822 (Internet Message 
  Format) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt
- See also RFC-2142 (MAILBOX NAMES FOR COMMON SERVICES, 
  ROLES AND FUNCTIONS), for suggested names like 
  "info", "marketing", "sales", "support", "abuse", "noc",
  "security", "postmaster", "hostmaster", et. al.
  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2142.txt
- See also RFC-3013 (Recommended Internet Service Provider 
  Security Services and Procedures) 
  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3013.txt

regards,

-- 
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim - VLSM-TJT - http://rms46.vlsm.org
PMPO net user count:  Pathetic Meaningless Pillory Outcome