[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Looking for Fetchmail / Mutt configuration advice



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 17 November 2001 1:46 pm, Morbo wrote:
...
> Here's what I'd like to achive:
>
> I have several POP3 accouts, which I would like to all be delivered to my
> Linux account.
> Ideally I would be able to see easily which mail came to which account
> originally.
> (I've allready set up fetchmail for one POP3 account, but I'm a bit unsure
> on how to best set up several.)
>

here is a partial example of polling several ISPs - and passing the data on 
(names and passwords changed).  I my case I pass on to exim which can then 
start sorting on addresses - but you may wish to modify addresses a little at 
this stage (lines user x is y mean that the mail becomes addressed to y 
locally)

As you can see its really easy to poll lots of ISPs for lots of users

# Created by AKC 14th July 2000
set syslog
set no bouncemail
poll mail.u-net.com no dns proto POP3
 aka chandler.u-net.com
 localdomains chandlerfamily.org.uk
 envelope "Envelope-to"
 user "ch" password "x" forcecr is *
 user "alan-c" password "x" forcecr is alan
 user "emily-c" password "x" forcecr is emily
poll mail.tesco.net proto POP3
        aka tesco.net
 user "a.c" password "x" forcecr is alan
 user "s.c" password "x" forcecr is sarah fetchall
poll pop3.blueyonder.co.uk no dns proto POP3
        aka blueyonder.co.uk
        localdomains chandlerfamily.org.uk
 user "ac" password "x" forcecr is *
 user "ac_2" password "x" forcecr is sarah
 user "ac_3" password "x" forcecr is emily
 user "ac_4" password "x" forcecr is carrie
 user "ac_5" password "x" forcecr is alan


- -- 

  Alan - alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE79nun1mf3M5ZDr2kRAivhAKCvZpx5+LBTztK/0vqylxiADZN5WwCfR5uT
xmJSRC9/TnXano5b7lm42O4=
=f3Jc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: