[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unresolvable installation problem?



On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 08:03:01AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
| On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:53, Harry Palmer wrote:
| > I have a (decent, 400MHz PII) laptop with no CDROM and an LS120 IDE
| > floppy drive instead of a standard floppy (which boot disks pick up as
| > hdd).
| >
| > Is that me stuffed as far as getting potato up and running? I tried a
| > few things with the idepci boot set, but there doesn't seem to be a
| > way of getting beyond the first boot floppy and getting the root
| > filesystem loaded. Has anybody been here before?
| 
| Couldn't you reconfigure the boot disk to use root=/dev/hdd?  From memory the 
| Potato boot disk uses loadlin so it should be easy to change the 
| specification for the root device.

I thought it used LILO.  The first screen certainly looks like lilo as
used by RH 6.1 and 7.0 to me.

| One thing I have been considering is to create a NFS-root floppy for laptops. 
| This would involve an initrd kernel using busybox (or some other statically 
| linked program with lots of utilities) with cardmgr compiled in.  Then the 
| /linuxrc could start pcmcia, put the network up, and have a network start 
| script that mounts NFS and does pivot_root and "exec /sbin/init".  This can 
| only be done with woody, however the image on the NFS server could be any 
| version of Linux as long as it doesn't stop the PCMCIA...  ;)
| 
| To do this I need to squeeze the kernel modules necessary and all the cardmgr 
| stuff into 440K of gzip -9 compressed space.
| 
| If you're interested in testing this then let me know.

This sounds quite interesting.  Would it be possible to test it (aside
from the PCMCIA) with a desktop machine?  I've got an old system with
an ne2k nic that I would like to set up as a diskless terminal.  So
far I've gotten stuck in getting it to recognize my other machine as
having an NFS server.  This would be a good way to determine which
side the problem is on (since, presumably, you know what you're doing
and would have the client correct :-))

-D



Reply to: