RE: Linux RAM drive support/performance

To: "Cory Snavely" <csnavely@umich.edu>
Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: RE: Linux RAM drive support/performance
From: "Paul McHale" <pmchale@doubleesolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 03:46:24 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 000401c165d6$5986d5a0$6401a8c0@desinc.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 007d01c165a1$35245c80$657ba8c0@umdl.umich.edu>

Cory,

> I saw them for $2K for 2 GB which is 3-4x the cost of the memory. I'm not
> sure how the performance would compare versus the virtual
> approach like you
> say--it is a little hard to believe it would justify the cost
> just on that.

I have hunted all over for an actual RAM based drive in this price range.
Any chance you remember where you found this drive?

Thanks,

Paul
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux RAM drive support/performance
  - From: "Cory Snavely" <csnavely@umich.edu>

References:
- Re: Linux RAM drive support/performance
  - From: "Cory Snavely" <csnavely@umich.edu>

Prev by Date: undefined symbol in libkssl?
Next by Date: Re: Bug#118173: xmms: playlist fonts screwed up, shows empty squares instead of text
Previous by thread: Re: Linux RAM drive support/performance
Next by thread: Re: Linux RAM drive support/performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread