[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /proc permissions



on Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:12:07AM -0500, Mullins, Ron (rmullins@DigiTerra.com) wrote:
> Andrej Hocevar wrote:
> 
> >did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or
> >was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question
> 
> It would seem just a little of both. ;) Karsten is often brusque in
> requesting list etiquette be observed. I will share a better way to
> change /proc entries later.

Viz:  my mail ettiquette statements (generally:  line wrap, postfix
(aka followup) response, HTML (don't), and grammar (generally) are
canned rants:

    rant:  a program to generate a well-known rant.  usage:  rant
    <rant-topic> Prepared rants include the following: backup, book,
    browser, bughowto, grammar, gpg, html, partition, quote, sshrsakey, xdm,
    vacation, wrap, help

    This program is available online at

	http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Download/rant-o-matic.tar.gz

A modicum of syntactic sugar is included:  "please" and "thank you".

I don't particularly care about thin-skinned sensitive types.  I'm not
out to insult people.  If you don't care for free assistance, send my
your fax number and I'll fax your dollar back.

> >mails that make you react irritable? yes, i know it's my not using
> >the shift-key etc., but this is a list for our debian-linux-related
> >problems, isn't it. so why then do you feel the urge to act as if i
> 
> You were asking for help, weren't you? He's asking that you make it
> easier on everyone who will read you mail and try to help you. It's
> only right that you do so.

Bingo.

> >please, don't make even more insulting generalizations about other
> >people's laziness. my second mail on this topic clearly shows that i
> 
> He didn't state that you were lazy. He said he was.

Bingo.

> >(about which i read in the very same /usr/src/linux/documentation
> >directory that you've mentioned).  <snip> if you ever intend to help
> >me again, please consider this advice on echoing. 
> 
> He told you he was going off of memory. Take that literally.

> >nb: my thoughts on quoting are unfortunately different from yours.
> >in general, when writing anything similar to (scientific) research
> >or any other papers vaguely connected with my domain of study --
> >that's comparative literature -- i strictly follow mla's rules. but
> 
> I'm not familiar with mla's rules....

Modern Language Association.

    http://www.mla.org/

We follow a different guide here.  I strongly recomment Raymond:

    "Email Quoting" from the Jargon File.
    http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/Email-Quotes.html

Also called "conversational style".

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>       http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?             Home of the brave
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/                   Land of the free
   Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire                     http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html

Attachment: pgp2TjgQuZTgk.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: