[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shall I upgrade to Woody?



Hi,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 09:22:06PM +0200, Sigue wrote:
> I know this is a bit to generic question, and it has been probably
> already discussed a 1000 times, but I'm fairly new, so please forgive
> me if I ask it nevertheless.

Yes.  If you ask this question here, answer is NO. (Half joking ...)

What ever other somewhat experienced people say, just do not "upgrade"
to unstable without _fair_ knowledge of Debian Package system.

I recommend you to start with upgrading to "testing" first.  With
tesing, you can have partial unstable on demand like:

# apt-get install libc6/unstable.

Read "man apt_preferences" in testing/woody.  Once you upgrade to apt in
woody, you can have pckages from unstable while having testing as your
system and can up/down-grade at your finger tip.  See my web page on my
sig where I wrote what I do :-)

> 1. Just checking. If I would want to upgrade to Woody, I'd need to add
> 'testing' or 'woody' to the sources.list, and then I'd need to issue
> 'apt-get dist-upgrade'?

Yes.  Use following to be safe side:
# apt-get -u dist-upgrade

> 2. Is it possible to somehow delete the package database, and make apt
> reread the official ones from debian.org?

# apt-get update

> 3. Is it possible to go back to the state in dselect before you
> started making selections?  I know that i theory 'R' should go back to
> the state before the current selection, but sometimes it seems to get
> stuck in a loop and alway brings me back the same dependency screen.
> Also if I made several selections, but then change my mind and want to
> go back to the state where it was when I've started dselect, is this
> possible?

Yes.  (Provided you keep woody at)

> Many,many thanks for your help in advance!  best regards, Balazs
No problem :-)
-- 
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ 
+  Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D  +
+  My debian quick-reference, http://www.aokiconsulting.com/quick/    +



Reply to: