Re: New startx behavior in testing?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New startx behavior in testing?
From: Paul Mackinney <paul@mackinney.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:08:44 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011016180844.A1107@mackinney.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011016195334.A29193@harmony.cs.rit.edu>
References: <[🔎] 02de01c1569b$fafeb280$0464b10a@orthogony.net> <[🔎] 20011016195334.A29193@harmony.cs.rit.edu>

dman muttered:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 04:40:07PM -0700, Greg Wiley wrote:
> | Since last night's Woody upgrade, startx no longer
> | works as before.  
> 
> Yeah, there is a bug.  Edit /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99xfree86-common_start
> and change
> 
> exec "$REALSTARTUP"
> 
> to
> 
> exec $REALSTARTUP
> 
> 
> HTH,
> -D
Perfect!

I'm starting to feel like a Debian  veteran. I didn't even panic when 
startx failed, just launched mutt and went to deb-user for the answer. 

D-man, you da' man.

Thanks, Paul
-- 
Paul Mackinney
paul@mackinney.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New startx behavior in testing?
  - From: dman <dsh8290@rit.edu>

References:
- New startx behavior in testing?
  - From: "Greg Wiley" <greg@orthogony.com>
- Re: New startx behavior in testing?
  - From: dman <dsh8290@rit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Movie makers for Linux?
Next by Date: Re: gs 6.5 package anywhere?
Previous by thread: Re: New startx behavior in testing?
Next by thread: Re: New startx behavior in testing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread