Re: BIND, named daemon
> > Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r3
>
>
> Why do I not get answer from the 'named' daemon?. I think it is not due to
> /etc/hosts.allow or deny options. The bind/README.Debian file does not say
> anything about.
bind 8.2.3
All the configuration files are the default one. Nothing has been changed.
Therefore, bind (named) is using its default /etc/bind/ configuration files.
nslookup
--------
skywalker:~# nslookup localhost
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
*** localhost can't find localhost: No response from server
skywalker:~#
dlint
-----
skywalker:~# dlint .
;; res_nsend to server default -- 127.0.0.1: Connection timed out
;; dlint version 1.3.3, Copyright (C) 1998 Paul A. Balyoz <pab@domtools.com>
;; Dlint comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
;; This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
;; under certain conditions. Type 'man dlint' for details.
;; command line: /usr/bin/dlint .
;; flags: normal-domain recursive.
;; run starting: Thu Oct 11 19:38:42 CEST 2001
;; ============================================================
;; Now linting .
;; res_nsend to server default -- 127.0.0.1: Connection timed out
ERROR: no name servers found for domain .
That domain is probably not a zone. Remove the leftmost portion of
the
name and try again.
;; ============================================================
;; dlint of . run ending with errors.
;; run ending: Thu Oct 11 19:39:10 CEST 2001
skywalker:~#
dig
-----
skywalker:~# dig @localhost . ns
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @localhost . ns
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; res_nsend to server localhost 127.0.0.1: Connection timed out
skywalker:~#
Some configuration files
------------------------
skywalker:~# cat /etc/hosts.deny
[...]
ALL: PARANOID
skywalker:~#
skywalker:~# cat /etc/hosts.allow
# All lines are comments
> > nslookup: ERROR: "IP, ... No response from server"
> >
> > dig: ERROR: "Connection time out"
> >
> >
> > Must I enable any option to allow the conection to the 'named' daemon?.
> > Where, if any?. If not, any idea?
Reply to: