on Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 09:56:43PM +0200, Antonio Arauzo (dax5@jazzfree.com) wrote:
> > I'd also prefer you kept list mail on-list.
>
> Sorry, I forgot to change the "To:" field.
> Why doesn't debian lists set "Reply-To:" field to the list address?
ObHolyWar: Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
ObTurnaboutIsFairPlay: Reply-To Munging Considered Useful:
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml
I subscribe to the former argument.
Mutt has a "reply to list" function -- you identify lists in the config
file, 'L' replies mail to the list address. Other mailers have similar
features. But mutt sucks less.
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
Attachment:
pgpxqQt6wZF71.pgp
Description: PGP signature