Re: Two ethernet cards, one IP?!?

[George Karaolides <george@karaolides.com>]

Hi, 

Thanks for the reply.

I shall certainly try using ipchains for this, and will let you know if it
works.

Best regards,

George Karaolides       8, Costakis Pantelides St.,
tel:   +35 79 68 08 86                   Strovolos, 
email: george@karaolides.com       Nicosia CY 2057,
web:   www.karaolides.com      Republic  of Cyprus


On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Matthew Sackman wrote:

> So you just block all traffic for on IP on one port, and for the other
> IP on the other port.
> 
> Please let me know if this works.
> 
> Under 2.4, I'd do something like:
> if eth0 is for 192.168.1.1 and eth1 is for 10.0.1.1
> iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -d 10.0.1.1 -j DROP
> iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -s 10.0.1.1 -j DROP
> iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -d 192.168.1.1 -j DROP
> iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -s 192.168.1.1 -j DROP
> 
> Should be able to be translated into ipchains somehow...
> 
> Good luck, hope this helps.
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have an Intel Nightshade server motherboard installed in an Intel server
> > case, running Debian 2.2r3 (potato).
> > 
> > Its on-board Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 ethernet card works fine on its
> > own.
> > 
> > When I install an Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 PCI card and configure two
> > ethernet interfaces, the PCI card answers to both IP addresses!
> > 
> > ifconfig returns separate hardware addresses for the two interfaces, yet
> > when I disconnect the cable to the on-board card, both interfaces continue
> > to function through the PCI card!
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Matthew Sackman
> Nottingham,
> ENGLAND
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The contents of this email are intended for the indicated recipient(s)
> only. This may or may not be indicated in the above email as it is
> enormously easy to fake email addresses (see the relevant RFCs).
> 
> For security reasons this email is likely to be gnupg signed. On the
> other hand it may not be if I forgot to do so. In any case, if you
> are reading this on a Windows based computer then there was no point
> in me doing so (provided that I remembered) as your computer is most
> likely being used by yourself and 2.8 other people at the same time
> (normally without your consent).
> 
> No responsibility will be accepted by anyone for any of the contents
> of this email. So tough. If in doubt, go compile Mozilla.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>