[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Web banner blocker



On Monday 10 September 2001 02:53 am, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:44:05AM -0400, Jason Boxman (jasonb@edseek.com) 
wrote:
> > On Monday 10 September 2001 02:24 am, Robert Waldner wrote:
>
> <...>
>
> > > I use junkbuster, not quit as extensive as webwasher, but Free as in
> > >  speech. I just set up junkbuster to listen on :8080 and forward
> > >  everything to squid on :8088.
> > >
> > > http://www.junkbuster.com/
> >
> > Yeah, I used to use junkbuster extensively.  But I found that
> > everytime I went to a new site, I was nailed with ads and needed to
> > add yet-another-entry to the block list.
>
> You're aware that JB does regexp blocking?  A few well-placed
> expressions, largely variations on /ad/, /Ad/, and /advert/, you can do
> a lot of damage.  I've a list of 50 patterns which keeps banners to a
> minimum.  Deselecting Java/Javascript, and de-animating GIFs, helps a
> lot too.

Yeah, but regexp was never really my thing.  I'd spend five minutes playing 
with a rule and reloading the page until the ad died.  Some places I go 
require JavaScript to be on.  Never found much use for Java though.

> > If a massively comprehensive blocklist was available somewhere (and I
> > was using one of those with like 500 entries from somewhere) then
> > maybe it wouldn't be that big of an issue.  Last time I used JB it
> > lacked any form of JS filtering as well.  I can do that in Konq, but
> > that's on a site-by-site basis.
>
> Note too that JB isn't a webwasher, it's a site blocker.  Webwasher
> actually rewrites HTML before it gets to your browser.

That's true.  But I'm happy with that behavior. :)

> Cheers.



Reply to: