Re: Java 1.3.1 for stable (2.2) ?
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:48:10PM -0700, Dmitriy wrote:
| On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:58:36PM -0400, dman wrote:
| > On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:09:42PM -0700, Dmitriy wrote:
| > | On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:05:34AM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
| > ...
| > | > Put this in you sources.list:
| > | >
| > | > # Blackdown Java
| > | > deb http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.blackdown.org/java-linux/debian woody non-free
| > |
| > | s/woody/potato/
| > |
| > | If you don't want to upgrade to testing/unstable...
| >
| > The only packages at that server are the jdk packages. You can't
| > upgrade anything else by having that server pointing to woody in your
| > sources.list.
|
| No, but JDK on that server depens on woody packages AFAIK.
If all you have is potato plus that server, then you still won't
automatically get woody -- you will be told that the package can't be
installed.
The j2sdk1.3 package (I got it from the UNC Metalab mirror) says this :
Depends: java-common, gsfonts-x11, locales, shellutils, fileutils,
libc6 (>= 2.1.2), xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4)
According to packages.debian.org all of those are in potato.
-D
Reply to: