Re: sqrt C function
Paul Scott wrote:
> Well that may date me a little even though I am actively programming at
> this moment. I will research this a little more. My logic would be it
> would break the rules of the language to assume that conversion.
I don't see how. I see it as a legitimate compiler optimization. If you
have "double f = 4;", and you compile 4 as a double-precision value
rather than as an int (which would then require an immediate
conversion), how could that possibly break a program?
Craig
Reply to: