[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Invalid boot signature



On 10 Aug 2001 09:35:30 -0500, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> Actually does running cfdisk show that the boot flag is on hda1?  It may
> not be written to it yet was my guess.  If it shows that it is there
> would be no harm in retrying to write the bootable flag to it to see if
> that fixes the problem.
> 
> --mike
> 
> On 10 Aug 2001 16:34:33 +0200, Sven Garbade wrote:
> > Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> > > 
> > > What does cfdisk have to say about your disk geometry?
> > > --mike
> > 
> > Disk Drive: /dev/hda
> > Size: 10262568960 bytes
> > Heads: 255   Sectors per Track: 63   Cylinders: 1247
> > 
> > There are no error messages generated by cfdisk
> > 
> > By, Sven
> > 
> > > On 10 Aug 2001 14:38:16 +0200, Sven Garbade wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > today I've deleted all Windows/DOS stuff on one of our Debian (Potato)
> > > > Boxes. Then I rearranged the hard disk. I know looks like:
> > > >                                                       size in MB
> > > >  hda1        Boot        Primary   Linux ext2         789.63
> > > >  hda5                    Logical   Linux              2097.45
> > > >  hda6                    Logical   Linux              2097.45
> > > >  hda7                    Logical   Linux ext2         16.46
> > > >  hda8                    Logical   Linux swap         131.61
> > > >  hda9                    Logical   Linux              5124.35
> > > >
> > > > When I run lilo, I got this error message:
> > > >
> > > > $:/sbin/lilo
> > > > Added j
> > > > Added n
> > > > Added r *
> > > > Fatal: First sector of /dev/hda1 doesn't have a valid boot signature
> > > >
> > > > What does this means?
> > > > There are no problems while booting, the system runs fine. But I can't
> > > > reconfigure lilo.
> > 
> 
> 
> 




Reply to: