[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC 2015 (PGP/MIME) MTA compliance (was Re: Off Topic: Mailing Agents?)



on Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 11:46:42PM +0200, Joost Kooij (joost@topaz.mdcc.cx) wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 01:16:50PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > ...so, arguably, at worst a mail client should display the body of the
> > message but treat the signature as an attachment.
> 
>  HA HA HA
> 
> People want to use their mail, not understand it.  It should be *easy*
> to attach your personal documents to messages sent to addresses that
> happened to be listed on a webpage you just visited.
> 
> Sigh, these unix people just don't get it, do they?  pgp/mime will never
> work if users can't click on it to see what will happen next.

Could you translate that into English please?

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>      http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?         There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/           http://www.kuro5hin.org
Free Dmitry!! Boycott Adobe!! Repeal the DMCA!!  http://www.freedmitry.org

Attachment: pgpszDggLNwbA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: