[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Keeping kernel compilation options



On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 02:49:00 +1000
Steve Kowalik <stevenk@hasnolife.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Mart van de Wege uttered:
> > Sorry to butt in in this thread, but my question seems to belong here
> as
> > well. I noticed yesterday that installing kernel-package on i386 does
> not
> > install bin86, which is necessary to build the boot code. Now I know
> Joost
> > is going to say that I should have used dselect :), but I think that
> bin86
> > would be a required dependecy on i386 then, wouldn't it? Or does
> Debian
> > use the same dependencies across all architectures?
> > Time to file a bug report? 
> No. It's _supposed_ to be like that. bin86 is only required on i386, and
> there
> isn't a way of making depends arch dependant.
>
Ah,

Ok. Much clearer now. I knew about the bin86 dependency, so I installed it
as a matter of course. Just curious after a long day of rebuilding my
laptop. OT: Note to buyers of a second hand laptop: buy a new HD to go
with it. The old one might be near the end of it's lifetime, I just had to
partition off 2G because of bad blocks.

Mart

-- 
Baby even the losers get lucky sometimes
Even the losers keep a little bit of pride

Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers - Even The Losers

Attachment: pgp6BkZb6N2Yl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: