[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: GUI for GCC



Hello Matthias,

Thanks for the reply.

Might be I'm looking for an ADE. I used to work with an Atari-ST, which had
a nice integrated editor/compiler/linker/debugger (edit sources, compile,
jump from errors to source, graphical debugger...)

Which one do you recommend?

Guus

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Richter [mailto:matthias@vielfalt.de]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:52 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GUI for GCC


Ellenkamp, Guus schrieb am Montag, den 16. Juli 2001:

> I'm looking for a Graphical User Interface for the GCC compiler.

¿What is this GUI supposed to do?

Aren't you rather searching for an application deveopment environment
like Xemacs, Kdevelop, GIDE ...?

Matth¡as
-- 
Matthias Richter --+- stud. soz. & inf. -+-- http://www.uni-leipzig.de
-->    GPG Public Key: http://www.matthias-richter.de/gpg.ascii    <--

· Projekt Deutscher Wortschatz: <URL:http://wortschatz.uni-leipzig.de>


**********************************************************************
De informatie verzonden met dit e-mailbericht (en bijlagen)
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n) en zij die
van de geadresseerde(n) toestemming kregen dit bericht te
lezen. Gebruik door anderen dan geadresseerde(n) is
verboden. De informatie in dit e-mailbericht (en bijlagen)
kan vertrouwelijk van aard zijn en kan binnen het bereik
vallen van een geheimhoudingsplicht en een verschonings-
recht.

Any information transmitted by means of this email (and any
of its attachments) is intended exclusively for the addressee
or addressees and for those authorized by the addressee
or addressees to read this message. Any use by a party
other than the addressee or addressees is prohibited.
The information contained in this email (or any of its 
attachments) may be confidential in nature and fall under a
pledge of secrecy and the attorney-client privilege.
**********************************************************************



Reply to: