RE: networking windows and linux
I don't want to start a war here and I've refrained
from replying to the many other posts, but there are
many NT machines which go for weeks and months on end
without being rebooted.
My departmental NT server had been up for 120-something
days last time I was there. I've been on vacation for
a few weeks so I don't know what it's at now.
Maybe it's luck; maybe our NT admins just know what
the hell they're doing. With MCSE's at a dime a dozen
anymore, it's hard to find people with a genuine clue.
Perhaps my company has done just that. *shrug*
Anyways, I'm done with this thread. It started as
an attempt at humor. I suppose there's still many
of those people with the attitude that Linux is a
better operating system than Windows at everything
there is. Then again, those with a clue understand
that it's a matter of which tool is best suited for
the job at hand.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <jlgaddis@blueriver.net>
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Topa [mailto:wtopa@dmcom.net]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 5:16 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: networking windows and linux
Subject: RE: networking windows and linux
Date: Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:29:24PM -0500
In reply to:Jeremy Gaddis
Quoting Jeremy Gaddis(jlgaddis@blueriver.net):
> Wow, Windows isn't a stable server!?
>
> Damn, I bet that's news to the millions of
> people and corporations worldwide who've been
> running it for years. ;)
>
But not to to their System admins, I'd bet. Having to reboot
often is not what I would call stable.
--
Bringing computers into the home won't change either one, but may
revitalize the corner saloon.
_______________________________________________________
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: