On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 07:29:28PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > > The reason why the run levels are specified was to handle cases where > An LSB application may wish to have some kind of daemon which is only > running when X11/xdm is running. name 5. > Now, we could have added yet another level of indirection (in computer > science no problem can't be solved by adding another layer of > indirection), but after a while, the layers upon layers of indirection > become nasty to deal with. In cases where we needed to add an extra > layer of indrection, we did so; for example, structured comments > define boot facilities such as $named or $remote_fs, instead of > "S46foo.d". so this runlevel business is soley about X. fine, i can think of NO daemon that relies on xdm being running off hand. certianly not enough for you to dictate to me how i setup my runlevels. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpzweLxB7bn3.pgp
Description: PGP signature