[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Attn: HP Pavilion 9680C (US) owners



Hang on, i'll try to fetch one for you.
stay in touch(1) :P

--
k h a o s * lamer
new name, new look, new ftp:
linuxxxxx.dyn.dhs.org (change FOUR letter)
upload something before downloading, or your class C IP banned.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin F. Krafft" <madduck@madduck.net>
To: "debian users" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 11:13 PM
Subject: [OT] Attn: HP Pavilion 9680C (US) owners


> hi all,
> please forgive this post, i am at the end of my wisdom, and HP prove
> to be dorks on all counts again. This has nothing to do with this
> list, but i spent a solid week now on the net and in touch with other
> people, trying to get help at no success. i figure that there's got to
> be some people even on this list that can help me...
>
> I am in desperate need for some drivers off the HP Pavilion 9680C (US)
> recovery CD, which, of course, you can't download at hp.com. They
> shipped their systems with that Conexant SoftK56 piece of junk modem.
> I had to reinstall Win98 (please feel free to express your sympathy
> via email!), and all the drivers and all the help i could get (mainly
> driverguide.com) are useless - according to HP I need the original
> drivers off the recovery CD if I want my modem to work.
>
> Moreover, they are throughly rude on the phone, you can clearly see
> how the most important thing at HP too is the money... (they wanted to
> charge me $25 per 15 minutes because i called from germany, even
> though the US system i had purchased was still within warranty). ack!
>
> Does anyone have that CD?
>
> martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
>   \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
> --
> due to lack of interest tomorrow has been cancelled.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>



Reply to: