Re: `holding back' packages?

[Mario Vukelic <mario.vukelic@chello.at>]

On 01 Jul 2001 12:38:10 -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:

> Yeah, but unstable is unstable ;)  With potato + custom stuff I have a
> compromise  that  suits me  pretty  well.  And  even unstable  doesn't
> provide every piece of software on the planet. 

There's nothing to say against stable + reasonably well managed custom
stuff. But installing random tarballs into system (apt) owned
directories is another matter and pretty brave :o)

--

I did not vote for the Austrian government