[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Postgresql 7.1 died



"Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps.net> writes:

>   And have you checked your postgres.log?

I forgot about the log.  Anyhow, I can not see from it how to correct
the situation:
---------------------------------
pq_recvbuf: unexpected EOF on client connection
Smart Shutdown request at Thu Jun 28 08:34:56 2001
Server process (pid 12898) exited with status 512 at Thu Jun 28 17:14:09 2001
Terminating any active server processes...
Server processes were terminated at Thu Jun 28 17:14:09 2001
Reinitializing shared memory and semaphores
The Data Base System is starting up
The Data Base System is starting up
The Data Base System is starting up
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster: Startup proc 12953 exited with status 512 - abort
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster: Startup proc 13036 exited with status 512 - abort
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster: Startup proc 13098 exited with status 512 - abort
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster: Startup proc 13138 exited with status 512 - abort
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster: Startup proc 13671 exited with status 512 - abort
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster: Startup proc 13859 exited with status 512 - abort
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster: Startup proc 13892 exited with status 512 - abort
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postmaster: Startup proc 14034 exited with status 512 - abort
------------------------------------------------

Fortunately the data is not that critical.  There were about 430000
records in a table inserted from ftplogs by a script.  I could have
tried removing postgresql and reinstall it, but that would be avoiding
the real problem - and it feels too much like the windows way of
doing.



Johann
-- 
Johann Spies
Informasietegnologie
Universiteit van Stellenbosch

     "One thing have I desired of the LORD, that will I seek
      after; that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all
      the days of my life, to behold the beauty of the LORD,
      and to inquire in his temple."            
                               Psalms 27:4       



Reply to: