Re: subject missing on some

[Kent West <westk@acu.edu>]

Andrew Dixon wrote:

> Let the flames begin.
>
> Kent West wrote:
>
> > /RANT
> > And while I'm on the subject of list netiquette (for anyone reading over
> > your shoulder), I believe it's proper to put your reply at the bottom of
> > the previous message instead of at the top, so that as the thread grows,
> > it's easy to jump in in the middle and be able to figure out what's been
> > said when.
> > /End of RANT
> I prefer putting my 2 cents into the middle of the message that I'm
> replying to.  I find it easier to respond to one comment at a time
> instead of saving everything up untill the end.  I do agree that it
> makes for a more readable message when responces follow the text that
> they are responding to instead of preceeding them.  
>
> later,
> Andy

Sorry, you're right. I spoke without thinking too hard. Yes, the 
responses should be tacked directly underneath the question, even if 
that's in the middle of a message. However, what I meant, is that 
responses should not be above the question.

Thanks for the correction.

Kent