On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:43:47PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > get a real mail client that supports RFCs. the relevant RFC is 2015 > > i reccommend mutt Supporting RFCs is fine and should be encouraged, but from what I've seen there is not another mail reader in existance that can verify mutt's attached signatures. I wrestled with this for a very very long time when switching to mutt. I've read the mutt developers' reasons for why inline sigs are bad, but when doing things the "right way" breaks things for everybody else, that's a bad situation. I know mutt people just come back and say "well everybody else is broken", but that argument just doesn't hold weight with me. Maybe mutt needs to wait until the rest of the world catches up to it, or, if the world has no intention of ever catching up to it, maybe the RFC needs rethinking. noah -- _______________________________________________________ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html
Attachment:
pgpEyG03N9D8M.pgp
Description: PGP signature