Re: Can linux do this?
Hello,
Add a rule to your incoming chain something like:
ipchains -A input -p tcp -s hostname.net -d you.local.ip 80 -m 100
to set a mark on all packets coming from some hostname to your local
webserver ip.
Then add an ipmasqadm rule something like:
ipmasqadm mfw -A -m 100 -r ip.of.webserver port.of.webserver
Andrew
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Daniel de los Reyes wrote:
> El Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:45:16AM -0400, ahall@secureworks.net dijo:
> -| Using the 2.2 kernel you could use ipchains to mark the packets then use
> -| ipmasqadm to forward based on the mark set.
>
> How would I do something like that? I mean marking the packages
> depending on the host-name they come from?
>
>
> -|
> -|
> -| Andrew
> -|
> -| On Thu, 3 May 2001, Daniel de los Reyes wrote:
> -|
> -| > I've put to work portforwarding with a 2.2 kernel and it works
> -| > wonderfull. However I want to push it a bit farther and was wondering if
> -| > this can be done:
> -| >
> -| > Using plain port forwarding what you get is calls to port Pa on host A
> -| > get forwarded to port Pb on host B.
> -| > Now what I need is, depending on the host name that makes demands to Pa
> -| > on B the packages get forwarded to a different host/port
> -| >
> -| > I know there is specific hardware dedicated to this and lot more
> -| > (Dispatcher) including load balance and such just wondering if I could
> -| > get a Linux machine to do the same
> -| >
> -| >
> -| > --
> -| > ______________________________
> -| > Daniel de los Reyes
> -| > S2-Selling Soluciones
> -| > Valencia Spain
> -| > e-mail: dadecal@s2-selling.com
> -| > Powered by Debian GNU-Linux 2.2r2
> -| > ______________________________
> -| >
> -| >
> -| > --
> -| > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> -| > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> -| >
> -|
>
> --
> ______________________________
> Daniel de los Reyes
> S2-Selling Soluciones
> Valencia Spain
> e-mail: dadecal@s2-selling.com
> Powered by Debian GNU-Linux 2.2r2
> ______________________________
>
Reply to: